Andrew Sullivan on GNP
One thing I greatly appreciate about Andrew — though he disagrees with Grand New Party on a lot of fundamental questions, he is extremely gracious and kind. One prime example is his column on the new Atlantic right. There is a sense in which everything I write is in dialogue with Andrew’s skeptical vision, which has definitely informed my own politics in a lot of ways that aren’t always easy to disentangle. He ends the column on an important note.
Conservatism, after all, has always been a strange mixture of dismay at social loss and pragmatism in helping to ameliorate it. It is not an ideology; it’s a flexible, pragmatic, modest approach to the necessary evil of government. In one era, big tax cuts, deregulation and a much smaller state may be appropriate. In another time, a different emphasis may be more fitting. This is the Tory genius – and it’s encouraging to see conservatives on both sides of the Atlantic grope gradually towards reinvention.
This is in striking contrast to Corey Robin’s view, of conservatism as a defense of hierarchy and privilege. It comes as no surprise that Andrew’s characterizations sounds right to my ears and Robin’s does not. But I wonder what Andrew would make of Robin’s argument.
I’m interested in the complex ways in which inequality and hierarchy are related, but also in the ways they cut against each or are orthogonal to each other. Will Wilkinson and Clay Shirky have written about this in their own ways, and so has Daniel A. Bell in the context of “the new Confucianism.” I hope to write more about this soon.
I’m picking my copy up on Friday (payday) and I’m very eager to have some of my questions answered. From all the posts, podcasts, interviews and other ancillary media about the book, I feel like I understand the policy proposals but don’t understand the culture. I do think Andrew Sullivan had it right the other day, about cultural resentment of affluent liberalism, and on a basic level I wonder why a couple of Harvard educated editors at the Atlantic seem to have such little use for cosmopolitanism.
— Freddie · Jul 14, 01:29 PM · #
I don’t think I have any resentment of affluent liberalism, though I do think it gets a lot of things wrong/can be pretty obtuse, and I have a lot of use for cosmopolitanism, in a lot of contexts.
— Reihan · Jul 14, 03:14 PM · #
Cosmopolitanism is often an evasion of duties to reciprocity by a society’s elite. It deserves a certain resentment.
— Chris · Jul 14, 03:47 PM · #
I don’t think I have any resentment of affluent liberalism
Again, I’m taking this from Sullivan’s post about such, the one cautioning that it creates divisiveness for little effect. I’m sure the book will give me a better understanding.
— Freddie · Jul 14, 06:12 PM · #
Cosmopolitanism is often an evasion of duties to reciprocity by a society’s elite. It deserves a certain resentment.
I don’t entirely agree with this sentiment, but its combination of pithiness and atavism is undeniably bracing.
— Matt Feeney · Jul 15, 11:56 AM · #