Do We Need White House Reporters?
Ana Maria Cox says no, arguing that White House reporters rarely break scoops of any significance and offering, as a replacement, this sensible idea:
[P]utting a horde of reporters on the site where the big decisions about the country’s future are made is no guarantee of enhanced coverage. Instead of heaping more telegenic reporters into a single White House beat, break up the work among the corps of plugged-in journalists. When the president speaks out on AIG, let financial and labor reporters truth-squad him; when North Korea launches a missile, let defense and Asia specialists assess the White House reaction. Let the beleaguered journalism business prove its worth by providing something you can’t get by watching the White House’s YouTube channel.
I basically agree, with the caveat that spending a lot of time at the White House and breaking frivolous stories might serve to develop a reporter’s relationships with administration staffers, which, one hopes, might lead to staffers becoming comfortable enough to talk in a non-scripted way, at least on occasion. It’s probably good to have reporters around that staffers could talk to about important matters, even most of what gets said is silly.
I think I agree with Peter’s caveat: there are certain stories that quite legitimately are “White House stories”. I’m thinking Watergate, or more recently some of the internal scandals of the Bush administration.
While topical stories can reasonably be handled by topical reporters, I think you do still need a dedicated White House squad for dedicated White House stuff.
— Ethan C. · Apr 19, 10:22 PM · #
Ethan — to rebut my own point, I’d note, as AMC does, that Watergate was broken by D.C. metro reporters, not the national political desk.
— Peter Suderman · Apr 20, 01:23 AM · #
“which, one hopes, might lead to staffers becoming comfortable enough to talk in a non-scripted way, at least on occasion.”
Living outside the beltway and working outside of journalism, my impression is that the benefit of this comfort has been, at least for the last several years, been flowing the wrong way. My own utterly uninformed opinion about why this is, if it even is so, is that over the last generation or so, journalism has been attracting a different sort of person, with different sorts of ambitions.
I do see some signs the tide is turning. Time will tell.
— Tony Comstock · Apr 20, 04:15 PM · #
All they need do is super glue Helen Thomas to a chair and voila!
— M00se · Apr 20, 10:04 PM · #