Grant Me This
I go back and forth on the merits of top-tier comics scribe Grant Morrison. On the one hand, I finding his special brand of hype-happy, free-your-mind, drug-addled, psychedelic mysticism kind of annoying. As a fan of Alan Moore, Hunter S. Thompson, Terry Gilliam, David Lynch, it’s not that I think that’s necessarily a bad way to go — it’s that, too often, Morrison seems less interested in telling stories or developing characters and lot more interested in LIKE, TOTALLY BLOWING YOUR MIND, MAN with EIGHT SOLID PAGES of SERIOUSLY FREAKY SHIT — CAN YOU EVEN BELIEVE IT?!!! OR UNDERSTAND IT?!! I KNOW, RIGHT? SOO CRAZY!
At his most frustrating — in books like The Invisibles — he’s overly interested in atmosphere and attitude, and maybe jostling his readers around a bit. But moody bullshit is still, well, bullshit, no matter how many copies of Arkham Asylum Morrison’s sold. This is probably a complaint that could be leveled at the comics/superhero genre in general, but Morrison seems worse than most.
On the other hand, when he decides to actually sit still for a moment and tell a story, he’s rather formidable — and, at his best, proves himself more than capable of employing his wacko interests in service of something genuinely moving. His multi-year run on New X-Men, which offered a significant change of pace for the team, if not quite a radical revamping, was expertly paced and surprisingly balanced — expertly blending genre convention and surreleastic incomprehension, story and soap opera, inner lives and radical ideas. He made sure that the book was accessible to just about anyone, but also provided plenty to mull over for those who wanted more. (For more on this, see this fascinating, lengthy explication of how Morrison used his run to critique the series’ previous decades.)
Nor is it that Morrison only succeeds when he’s reigned in by the rules and conventions of “mainstream” comics. His recent run with Batman — which climaxed with the character’s kinda-sorta “death,” or something like it — is semi-coherent, focused far more of freaky-deaky fractured storytelling and can-you-believe-your-eyes milestone events (Batman has a son! Batman dies! Or does he!) than the crucial plot and character mechanics that ought to drive this sort of story. But comparatively out-there limited series like The Filth and We3, on the other hand, both work expertly, weaving thematic Morrison’s fascination with personhood and identity into carefully worlds equal parts utter nonsense and gritty reality. The Filth is almost impossible to summarize (though if you’re interested, knock yourself out with this totally accurate but totally inadequate Wikipedia article), but let’s just say that if David Cronenberg ever produces a series for HBO, I dearly hope it’s an adaptation of The Filth.
Still, of all the Morrison works I’ve read, I suspect We3 is the most likely to be of interest to TAS readers, as it’s something of a sci-fi inversion of Watership Down (or perhaps a grown-up retelling of The Secret of NIMH) — telling a story of cuddly housepets who’ve been bioengineered into ultra deadly killing machines by the military industrial complex. After assassinating a number of third-world dictators in a bioweapons trial phase, they’re scheduled for decommissioning. But they escape, and fight off the military as they search for someplace they can call home. Morrison’s decision to give the animals rudimentary speech — “gud dog”, “bad dog”, “stay”, “is come” — blurs the line between Ninja-Turtle style cartoon anthropomorphism and cute-pet sentimentalism, but ends up someplace smarter and more affecting than either — with alien creatures you somehow relate to anyway. It’s weird. It’s graphic. It’s probably going to get you funny looks on the subway. But it’s also surprisingly touching.
And that’s why it’s so frustrating when Morrison decides to go the hipster mad-scientist route and coast on pomo allusions and a very high weird-shit factor. Believe me, I like weird shit as much as the next comic-book-loving libertarian journalist — but when you’re looking for an actual story, it’s not enough.
I was always more of a DC kid growing up. I got lucky when I started reading comics to have Morrison’s Doom Patrol run pushed on me early, which blew my mind for what comics could do. I prefer it to Invisibles in part for the reasons you bring up why X-Men works so well; there’s all kinds of mind-blowing stuff but the series is still about a handful of outcasts trying to make sense of an even stranger world. And don’t even get started on how awesome Animal Man was.
His JLA was an interesting attempt, but what he was trying to get (the best summer blockbuster in a comic format) was better done by Ellis/Hitch’s run on Authority. I’d also recommend his run on “Marvel Boy”, which is a great blend of his mind-blowing stuff and Kirby-esque original comic wonder, and should get talked up more.
For every two of these there’s a mess like Final Crisis, so I understand your ambivalence. It’s kept me from being the Morrison booster I used to be. Have you read Seven Soldiers? I’ve heard it may be his best but I’ve never gotten to it.
— Mike · Jan 23, 08:28 PM · #
I read the first half of Seven Soldiers. It was pretty good, though seemed to be trying too hard at points. I never finished it to no fault of Morrison’s.
— Trumwill · Jan 24, 03:30 AM · #
House pets bioengineered to be killers? Sounds suspiciously like “G-Force.” Didn’t much care for it the first time around…
— Sonny Bunch · Jan 24, 04:52 AM · #
I’m with Mike — I don’t think Morrison’s ever topped his Animal Man run. The Coyote Gospel (sweet Jesus, the Coyote Gospel!), Buddy breaking the fourth wall and staring out at the reader, and then the big finale to the storyline… I love a lot of his work, but that still stands for me as the best thing Morrison’s ever done.
— Erik Siegrist · Jan 24, 10:28 PM · #
It makes me really glad to find there are comic geeks amongst the TAS readership.
— Peter Suderman · Jan 25, 05:41 AM · #